GMP News, GMP guidelines, GMP Violations, GMP warnings A Public Health Global News Portal

Welcome to www.seekgmp.com FDA, WHO, EU, TGA, CDSCO guidelines...and GMP Violations news/warning letters..

150000+ Industry Leaders already read it everyday

  • This is default featured slide 1 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

  • GMP Trends, Quality Tools

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

  • GMP News drifts on Market and economy

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

  • This is default featured slide 4 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

  • What to Ask Your Doctor Before Taking Opioids

    Every patient should ask questions when getting a new prescription. This is especially important when your doctor, dentist or other health care professional prescribes you an opioid, such as hydrocodone, oxycodone, codeine and morphine. What should you ask?

Monday, May 18, 2020

FDA Guideline to 21 CFR PART 211 SUB PART-D EQUIPMENT #21CFR #PART211 #EQUIPMENT #PBS #PBSINDIA

FDA Guideline to 21 CFR PART 211 SUB PART-D EQUIPMENT #21CFR #PART211 #EQUIPMENT #PBS #PBSINDIA




GMP News, GMP guidelines, GMP Violations, GMP warnings, GMP Trends. A Public Health Global News Portal. (This story has not been edited by GMP Violations staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed/ experts experiences sharing.) Disclaimer: The Logos/Images & content posted here are belongs to respective to Authority / owners of firm. The Article posted under public health importance news. Please ensure the guideline as per Regulatory agencies.
Share:

Friday, May 15, 2020

FDA GUIDE TO 21 CFR PART 211 AND SUB PARTS #FDAGUIDE #21CFR #PART211 #FORMULATIONS #GMP #PHARMAGUIDE

FDA GUIDE TO 21 CFR PART 211 AND SUB PARTS #FDAGUIDE #21CFR #PART211 #FORMULATIONS #GMP #PHARMAGUIDE




FDA GUIDE TO 21 CFR PART 211 AND SUB PARTS #FDAGUIDE #21CFR #PART211 #FORMULATIONS #GMP #PHARMAGUIDE

GMP News, GMP guidelines, GMP Violations, GMP warnings, GMP Trends. A Public Health Global News Portal. (This story has not been edited by GMP Violations staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed/ experts experiences sharing.) Disclaimer: The Logos/Images & content posted here are belongs to respective to Authority / owners of firm. The Article posted under public health importance news. Please ensure the guideline as per Regulatory agencies.
Share:

Sunday, June 24, 2018

FDA Warns Drug Facilities in China, Ireland, Australia and India















FDA Warning Letters go to Manufacturers in China, Ireland, Australia and India
In the Month of May-2018 The US FDA has issued Warning Letters to pharmaceutical firms which not address cGMP practices
The drug facilities are:
  • Jilin Shulan Synthetic Pharmaceutical und Nox Bellcow Cosmetics Co, China
  • Jalco Cosmetics, Australia
  • Europharma Concepts, Ireland
  • Reine Lifescience, India.

The five manufacturers were placed on FDA import alert until the complete correction of all violations. Here are some of the findings:
Jilin Shulan Synthetic Pharmaceutical, China

During the four-day inspection, a number of GMP violations were detected. These included a lack of documentation for deviations, insufficient data-protection controls as well as record-keeping delays during manufacturing operations. Especially the integrity of data and the well-functioning of the quality unit were questioned. It was found that operators were able to modify and delete files on the firm’s systems. Therefore, the quality of the manufactured drugs was considered insufficient. It also appeared evident that the staff had no knowledge of GMP.
Observations:
1.    Failure to document known deviations and out-of-specification results and conduct a thorough investigation.
2.    Failure to exercise sufficient controls over computerized systems to prevent unauthorized access or changes to data, and failure to have adequate controls to prevent omission of data.
3.    Failure to record activities at the time they are performed.
Jalco Cosmetics, Australia

Observations:

1.    Your firm failed to have, for each batch of drug product, appropriate laboratory determination of satisfactory conformance to final specifications for the drug product, including the identity and strength of each active ingredient, prior to release (21 CFR 211.165(a)).
2.    Your firm failed to test samples of each component for conformity with all appropriate written specifications for identity, purity, strength, and quality (21 CFR 211.84(d)(1) & (2)).
3.    Your firm failed to establish written procedures for production and process control designed to assure that the drug products you manufacture have the identity, strength, quality, and purity they purport or are represented to possess (21 CFR 211.100(a)).

4.    Your firm failed to establish an adequate written testing program designed to assess the stability characteristics of drug products. (21 CFR 211.166(a)).


The FDA concludes that they  “recommend a qualified third party to perform a comprehensive audit of the entire operation for cGMP compliance, including the quality assurance system, materials system, facility and equipment system, laboratory system, production system, and packaging and labelling system. CAPA should then be evaluated by the third party to help ensure systemic remediation before pursuing resolution of your firm’s compliance status.”
Europharma Concepts, Ireland
Observations:

1.    Your firm failed to test samples of each component for conformity with all appropriate written specifications for identity, purity, strength, and quality (21 CFR 211.84(d)(1) and (2)).

2.    Your firm failed to establish adequate written procedures for production and process control designed to assure that the drug products you manufacture have the identity, strength, quality, and purity they purport or are represented to possess, and your firm’s quality control unit did not review and approve those procedures, including any changes (21 CFR 211.100(a))

Reine Lifescience - India

Observations:

1.    Failure to validate and verify the suitability of analytical methods.
2.    Failure to exercise sufficient controls over computerized systems to prevent unauthorized access or changes to data, and failure to have adequate controls to prevent omission of data.
3.    Failure to adequately validate written procedures for the cleaning and maintenance of equipment


 www.gmpviolations.com GMP News, GMP guidelines, GMP Violations, GMP warnings, GMP Trends. A Public Health Global News Portal. (This story has not been edited by GMP Violations staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed/ experts experiences sharing.) Disclaimer: The Logos/Images & content posted here are belongs to respective to Authority / owners of firm. The Article posted under public health importance news. Please ensure the guideline as per Regulatory agencies.
Share:

Thursday, March 22, 2018

Alembic Pharma gets three observations from US FDA for Gujarat plant


















Alembic Pharmaceuticals said none of the observations are related to data integrity or repetitive in nature
Alembic Pharmaceuticals said the US health regulator has made three observations after inspecting its formulation facility in Panelav, Gujarat.
“The United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) has conducted an inspection at Alembic Pharmaceuticals formulation facility located at Panelav from March 12-20, 2018. This was a scheduled inspection and at the end of the inspection, the US FDA issued a form 483 with 3 observations,” the company said in a regulatory filing.
Alembic Pharmaceuticals said none of the observations are related to data integrity or repetitive in nature. “The company is preparing the response to the observations, which will be submitted to the US FDA shortly,” it added.
As per the US FDA, a Form 483 is issued to a firm’s management at the conclusion of an inspection when investigator has observed any conditions that in its judgement may constitute violations of the Food Drug and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act and related Acts. It notifies the company’s management of objectionable conditions.

Source: Expressbpd
www.gmpviolations.com GMP News, GMP guidelines, GMP Violations, GMP warnings, GMP Trends. A Public Health Global News Portal. (This story has not been edited by GMP Violations staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed/ experts experiences sharing.) Disclaimer: The Logos/Images & content posted here are belongs to respective to Authority / owners of firm. The Article posted under public health importance news. Please ensure the guideline as per Regulatory agencies.
Share:

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

FDA has issued form 483 to Dr. Reddy's Laboratory | API | IDA Bollaram | GMP VIOLATIONS |


FDA has insured form 483  to Dr. Reddy's Laboratory | API | IDA Bollaram | GMP VIOLATIONS |








The US FDA has been inspected the Dr. Reddy's laboratory located at IDA Bollaram which is manufacturing of Active pharmaceutical ingredients. The form 483 has been issued with 5 observations.


OBSERVATION 1:
The responsibilities and procedures applicable to the Quality control unit are not fully followed. Specially 

      A)     Your quality unit failure to close multiple CAPAs within allowable timeframe and justification to extend the completion timeframe was not requested. Specifically, your quality unit did not request an extension to the few CAPAs.

      B)      One of QC laboratory Audit trail reviewed and found discrepancy which is having without logging incident. And proper justification found.

      C)      Failed to establish Quality agreements with starting materials suppliers

      D)     Failure to follow the Incident reporting system as per your site SOP.

OBSERVATION 2:
Procedures describing the handling of written and oral complaints related to API Materials are not followed.

     A)     In adequate closure of market complaint closure without tracking fulfillment.
     B)     Complaint investigation concluded with CAPA, no CAPA has logged and not implemented the            SOP revision.

OBSERVATION 3:
Building used in the manufacturing, processing, packing of API finished materials are not maintained in a good state of repair.
As the facility containment not meeting as required.

OBSERVATION 4:
Separate or defined areas to prevent contamination or mix-ups are deficient regarding operations related to the quarantine storage of API finished materials prior to release.

OBSERVATION 5:
There is NO assurance that the equipment used in the production of ___ and ___API are always maintained and kept in under proper conditions for manufacturing operations and no prevent the contamination of the products.

A)     Failure to fulfil the record sheets as required
B)      A piece of fabric thread was  observes the inside the filled container

C)      Presence of product was observed inside the following production equipment.


www.gmpviolations.com GMP News, GMP guidelines, GMP Violations, GMP warnings, GMP Trends. A Public Health Global News Portal. (This story has not been edited by GMP Violations staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed/ experts experiences sharing.) Disclaimer: The Logos/Images & content posted here are belongs to respective to Authority / owners of firm. The Article posted under public health importance news. Please ensure the guideline as per Regulatory agencies.
Share:

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

CIPLA gets 483 by U.S. FDA For Goa Unit | CIPLA 483 | FDA |













Cipla Ltd. received eight observations regarding manufacturing practices at its Goa plant that contributes a quarter of the drugmaker’s sales in the U.S.
The facility of India’s second-largest pharma company by market value was inspected from Jan. 22 -25, according to a Form 483 issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Here are the eight U.S. FDA observations for the Goa plant:
  • Failure to review out of specification investigation.
  • Failure of documentation of batch production and control records.
  • Laboratory records incomplete of all data obtained during testing.
  • Establishment test procedures are not followed.
  • No visual examination of reserve samples lots.
  • Appropriate lab determination of drugs missing.
  • Quality control procedures are not in writing and fully followed.
  • Equipment not of appropriate design.
The first observation is a repeat and a little concerning while the others are procedural, said Praful Bohra of brokerage Equirus Capital. Cipla will have to explain to the U.S. FDA the difference in the conclusion tests for the plant to get cleared, he said.

Source: BloombergQuint



www.gmpviolations.com GMP News, GMP guidelines, GMP Violations, GMP warnings, GMP Trends. A Public Health Global News Portal. (This story has not been edited by GMP Violations staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed/ experts experiences sharing.) Disclaimer: The Logos/Images & content posted here are belongs to respective to Authority / owners of firm. The Article posted under public health importance news. Please ensure the guideline as per Regulatory agencies.
Share:

Saturday, March 10, 2018

FDA Guide to Equipment design, size, and location 211.63



FDA Guide to Equipment design, size, and location 211.63
Subpart D--Equipment

Sec. 211.63 Equipment design, size, and location


Equipment used in the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of a drug product shall be of appropriate design, adequate size, and suitably located to facilitate operations for its intended use and for its cleaning and maintenance.

In order to properly specify equipment and systems, the pharmaceutical manufacturer needs to identify the manufacturing process. This requires that during the development of the product, the critical quality attributes (CQA) of the product, and the associated critical process parameters (CPP) that directly affect the attributes, be identified and the effort of the parameters on the attributes be understood. These requirements are to be included in a user requirements specification (URS) of the equipment/system. This specification is to focus only on the manufacturing requirements, for example, range of critical processing parameters, sensitivity of the control system to maintain these parameters, and so on. The purpose of this focus is to ensure that the qualification testing is limited only to the equipment capabilities that are required to manufacture an effective product.

In the past it was common to have qualification testing address all equipment’s/system capabilities. However, this type of testing is normally addressed during the start-up and commissioning of the equipment/system. Only capabilities that the manufacturing characteristics are tested during qualification. Therefore, commissioning tests the equipment/system against the requirements of the purchased specification, whereas the qualification testing address those requirements in the URS.

An important tool used during the selection of equipment is to perform an impact assessment. The impact assessment provides a scientific rationale to the effect the equipment system has on the quality attributes of the product being manufactured. The assessment segregates equipment system into three categories: direct impact, indirect impact, and no impact. This categorization enables the appropriate attention to be directed towards the specification, installation, and qualification of equipment system.
Once the use of equipment system has been properly identified, as indicated in the previous edition, several parameters are to be considered when evaluating the equipment:

1.   Availability of spares and servicing

2.   The frequency and ease of maintenance will significantly impact on productivity and even quality. Equipment breakdown during processing could adversely affect quality. Included in the maintenance evaluation should be the cleanability of the equipment. This will involve accessibility to the parts to be cleaned and the relative ease of disassembly.

3.   Environmental issues are important constructions. Is the design of the equipment conducive to the application? Such attributes as the ability to contain toxic products, the ability to contain dust, the ability to maintain aseptic conditions, etc. need to be reviewed.

4.   Construction materials and design (see 211.65)

5.   The type of process controls such as automatic weight adjustment on tablet presses and temperature recorders on ovens. The use of these controls has become a routine and is expected in today’s manufacturing environment. The PAT initiative depends upon these controls to demonstrate that the manufacturing process is under control and to facilitate a continuous improvement program.

New equipment should not be used for commercial production until it has been qualified and the proceeds in which it is to be used has been validated; this applies equally to laboratory and other test equipment. All equipment should be appropriately identified with a unique number, to allow reference in maintenance programs and in batch records (see also 211.105(a)).

HP 15-bs601TU 2017 15.6-inch Laptop (6th Gen Intel Core i3-6006U/8GB/1TB/Windows 10/Integrated Graphics), Smoke Gray



The location of the equipment in the facility must enable an efficient flow of the manufacturing process. Manufacturing trains should be uni-directional whenever feasible. Back flow or cross flow within the process are to be minimised, as these incidences inherently have a high capability to cause mistakes.

The equipment system is to be placed in such a manner so as to enable all parts requiring maintenance, instrumentation, and calibration to be easily accessible. The key is easily accessible. Locating equipment in areas that are inaccessible usually means the maintenance and cleaning operational are not performed adequately, and thus leads to errors during the manufacturing of products.

References: 

FDA

Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceuticals, Sixth Edition edited by Joseph D. Nally


 www.gmpviolations.com GMP News, GMP guidelines, GMP Violations, GMP warnings, GMP Trends. A Public Health Global News Portal. (This story has not been edited by GMP Violations staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed/ experts experiences sharing.) Disclaimer: The Logos/Images & content posted here are belongs to respective to Authority / owners of firm. The Article posted under public health importance news. Please ensure the guideline as per Regulatory agencies.
Share:
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Popular Posts

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Subscribe Free GMP Guidelines

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Followers

Printfriendly

Subscribe via email for free

Services

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Menu :
Powered by Blogger.

Visitors

    Translater

    Category

    2016 (37) 2017 (85) 2018 (10) 211 CFR (2) 211.63 (1) 21cfr (1) 483 (5) AAFA (1) Abbott (2) AboutUs (1) ALCOA (1) Alerts (2) ANDA (1) Anshu (2) Antibiotics (1) apic (1) APR17 (8) APS (2) Articles (4) AstraZeneca (1) Aug17 (2) Aurobindo (2) Author (2) Authors (8) Biocon (1) cadila (1) capa (3) CDSCO (5) Change control (1) Christian Green (1) cipla (2) Cleaning validation (1) Data Integrity (9) dec16 (15) Definations (1) Deviations (1) Donald Trump’s (2) Downloads (17) Dr.Reddy's (4) eca (1) EIR (1) Eli Lilly (1) ema (12) EU (9) FDA (73) FDA Guide (20) FEB17 (15) Genaral (1) General Health (2) GMP (1) GMP News (36) gsk (2) GuidelineEU (10) GuidelinesG (5) GuidelineW (2) GV/0117/001 (1) GVAuthors (3) Health (4) HOSPIRA (1) ICH (3) ICHGuide (3) import alert (1) India (1) ISPE (1) James Bullock (1) JAN17 (23) Jul17 (8) July17 (1) Jun17 (4) Lupin (2) Mahender (40) MAR17 (13) Mar18 (7) May17 (10) May18 (1) MHRA (3) MHRA guide (1) Mumbai (1) Mylan (4) Natco (1) News (55) Non Complinaces (1) Nov16 (5) Novartis (1) oct (1) Oct16 (10) OCT17 (1) PDA (1) Personnel (1) pfizer (1) pics (8) Picsguide (2) QbD (1) Quality Docs (1) RCA (1) Recall (1) safety (1) Sanjeev Kumar Singh (4) Sanofi (1) Sep16 (6) Siegfried Schmitt (2) SUN (1) TGA (3) TOP 10 PHARMA (1) USP (2) Validation (3) Warning Letters (44) WHO (6) zika (1)

    Sponsors

    Theme Support