The U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) inspected Chinese firm M/s Baoying County Fukang Medical
Appliance Co. revealed serious 6 GMP Violations. Details as below
Our investigators documented that your firm limited and/or
refused an FDA inspection. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
FD&C Act), as amended by the Food and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (FDASIA), section 707, 21 U.S.C. 351(j), your drug products are
adulterated in that they have been manufactured, processed, packed, or held in
an establishment where the owner or operator has limited inspection and refused
inspection.
FDA investigators has documented
that the firm has refused limited access to audit and firm having methods,
facilities, or controls for manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding do
not conform to CGMP.
This warning letter summarizes
an inspection and significant deviations from CGMP for drug manufacturing.
1. Your
firm delayed, denied, or limited an inspection, or refused to permit the FDA
inspection.
On June 6, 2016,
during the inspectional walk through of the laboratory testing area of your
facility, our investigator asked you to explain the microbiological testing
processes used on the (b)(4) that you manufacture and
distribute to the United States. Your firm’s representative stated he would not disclose the firm’s
trade secrets. Our investigator explained that as part of the inspection, FDA
needs to know the details of the operations, and that FDA does not disclose
details of the information. Nonetheless, without reasonable explanation, the
full test procedure was never provided.
Your firm limited the
inspection by refusing to disclose the manufacturing process you use in your
facility to conduct microbiological testing on (b)(4). You may wish to review FDA’s guidance
document, Circumstances that Constitute Delaying, Denying, Limiting, or
Refusing a Drug Inspection, at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/regulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm360484.pdf
2.
Your firm failed to establish an adequate quality control unit with
the responsibility and authority to approve or reject all components, drug
product containers, closures, in-process materials, packaging material,
labeling, and drug products. (21 CFR 211.22(a))
During the
investigation, our investigator found your firm has no written procedures for
production or quality unit responsibilities. Among other things, your quality
unit approved and released (b)(4) and (b)(4) for
distribution to the U.S. market. Your firm approved these products for release
even though your quality unit had no assurance that they met specifications or
that they were manufactured under adequate controls.
3.
Your firm does not have, for each batch of drug product,
appropriate laboratory determination of satisfactory conformance to final
specifications for the drug product, including the identity and strength of
each active ingredient, prior to release. (21 CFR 211.165(a))
Your firm manufactures (b)(4) labelled
“For (b)(4).” Your firm stated to the investigator that you do not
perform microbiological analysis of your final products prior to release to the
U.S. market. In addition, you informed our investigator that you do not perform
assay testing for your over-the-counter (OTC) drug products to verify the
identity and strength of the active ingredients prior to release. Your firm
also failed to provide requested records for chemical analyses performed for
products released to the U.S. market.
4.
Your firm failed to maintain the buildings used in the manufacture, processing,
packing, or holding of a drug product in a clean and sanitary condition and to
keep them free of infestation by rodents, birds, insects, and other vermin. (21
CFR 211.56(a))
Our investigator
documented copious amounts of unknown black, mold-like material on the floor
and walls of warehouse #2. In addition, our investigator observed standing
water on the floor and live insects at the entrance of the same warehouse. This
warehouse is a storage area for (b)(4) used in the production
of your firm’s (b)(4). The poor conditions in your facility could
compromise the quality of the products you manufacture.
5.
Your firm failed to provide adequate washing facilities, including
hot and cold water, soap or detergent, air driers or single service towels, and
clean toilet facilities easily accessible to working areas. (21 CFR 211.52)
There was no adequate
washing facility accessible to working areas at your site. Additionally, the
only toilet facility on-site contained visible sewage and had no running water.
This toilet facility is shared by production, quality, and administrative personnel
at your facility.
6.
Your firm failed to establish and follow written procedures describing in
sufficient detail the receipt, identification, storage, handling, sampling,
testing, and approval or rejection of components and drug product containers
and closures. (21 CFR 211.80(a))
Specifically, your
firm receives drums of (b)(4) raw material from your supplier
without any identifying labels. Your firm does not perform identity testing or
any other analysis onincoming raw materials upon receipt or prior to use, and
you have no procedure that permits you to trace the source of the (b)(4) in
each batch of finished products.
www.gmpviolations.com GMP News, GMP guidelines, GMP Violations, GMP warnings, GMP Trends. A Public Health Global News Portal. (This story has not been edited by GMP Violations staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.) Disclaimer: The Logos/Images & content posted here are belongs to respective to Authority / owners of firm. The Article posted under public health importance news.
0 comments:
Post a Comment