Understanding CAPA
Corrective Action
Preventive Action or CAPA is utilized in continuous improvement to provide
actions needed to correct, eliminate recurrence, and prevent poor quality.
CAPA’s are changes connected with change control, risk management, and
continuous improvement.
The difference
between a corrective and preventive action can be misunderstood as well as the
difference between a correction and a corrective action. The defined scope of
CAPA provides further clarification:
- A correction is an immediate one-time action to
fix a non-conformity. This can be classified as rework or a repair having
little risk or impact which is typically completed informally.
- A corrective action is an action taken to
eliminate or reduce the cause and recurrence of a nonconformity or other
undesirable event which poses greater risk and is formally completed
(there is action taken after there is a failure).
- Preventive actions eliminate or reduce a
nonconformity or undesirable event by averting their occurrence (A failed
event has not occurred yet, but there are actions taken to stop a failure
or nonconformity from happening). Preventive action(s) can result from an
effective corrective action or through continuous risk identification
during any stage where changes are made as applicable to processes,
systems, etc., to eliminate, avoid, or reduce the occurrence of issues
leading to poor quality.
As a CAPA system
collects information and develops, it should advance from less corrective to
more preventive actions. It is good practice to standardize preventive actions
as applicable across other processes, procedures, and systems resulting from
corrective actions and risk management. In the long haul, preventing the right
risks instead of correcting issues as they occur saves more time, money, and
customer relationships as there is less rework. CAPA systems are effective when
they are perceived and utilized as a proactive system rather than a reactive
one. A risk-based approach emphasizes effective planning and risk management
for providing important monitoring, control, and action to identify, evaluate,
and prioritize the most critical issues in preventing them. As more data
becomes available, it is more important to evaluate and improve the risk
management system for it to continue to be effective and reliable.
CAPAs are an
integral part of change, continuous improvement, and risk management. Changes
are evaluated and prioritized based on risk, are implemented once tested and
approved, and monitored for effectiveness. If additional improvements are
identified, then the process starts over which is consistent with the Plan, Do,
Check/Study, Act continuous improvement cycle. CAPAs need to be uniquely
identifiable to ensure traceability and easy retrieval for audits, research,
and their management. It is necessary to classify actions as corrective or
preventive to make comparisons between prevention versus correction and to
evaluate how the system is utilized. This can provide valuable feedback to
determine if the system is used proactively or reactively.
An effective CAPA
system sufficiently investigates and identifies true root causes, implements
corrective actions for the root causes, utilizes preventive actions to improve
and standardize where applicable, properly implements and monitors
actions/changes for effectiveness, and provides transparency for completion of
all steps. They should not only be applied to products but also processes and
systems as well. They are systems that rely on internal and external feedback.
If internal and external systems are not integrated adequately and standardized
to communicate information consistently, then the system can become less
effective.
Author: James Bullock, PMP, ASQ CMQ/OE, CSSGB
www.gmpviolations.com GMP News, GMP guidelines, GMP Violations, GMP warnings, GMP Trends. A Public Health Global News Portal (This story has not been edited by GMP Violations staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.) Disclaimer: The Logos/Images posted here are belongs to respective to Authority / owners of firm.
0 comments:
Post a Comment